During my discussions with a number of executives, many of
whom I am mentoring in one way or another, the topic of how they have been
treated by various organizations during the recruitment process has come up a
lot. One of the biggest gripes that I hear over and over again is the lack of
respect that they receive when they interview for a position and don’t receive an
offer. Typically, when you make it to the step of getting an actual interview
for an executive level position, you are one of only a handful of candidates being considered. As
such, one would expect that when they are not chosen, they would receive some
form of personal communication regarding the decision and maybe, if the company
is really on the ball, some feedback on what they liked and what they felt the
candidate could have improved on. What I am hearing is that many times, all the
candidate receives is the same basic form email that every other candidate
receives that wasn’t even selected for an interview. “We regret to inform that
we will not be moving forward with your candidacy…blah, blah, blah.” Sometimes,
it is just automatically generated through Indeed or whatever platform that
they posted the job on, which makes it even worse. Keep in mind, that we are
only talking about the candidates that were interviewed which is typically a
very small number and to whom it shouldn’t be difficult to provide personalized
messaging.
What you need to understand as someone who is responsible
for recruitment for your organization, especially at the executive level, is
that how you treat your candidates can strongly impact how that candidate views
your organization, positively or negatively.
Recruitment as Marketing
As executives, many of us have to make decisions on vendor
relationships. That could be whether we want to start doing or continue to do business
with a particular company. Now, think about this. You are an executive of
Company A who once went through the recruitment and interview process with
Company B and felt that it was impersonal and disrespectful. Company B now is
lobbying heavily to do business with Company A and you are a major influencer of
whether that happens. How likely are you to let that negative experience impact
your decision to do business with Company B? I would say the probability of
that is very high. Some might say that allowing personal experiences to impact
a business decision is slightly unethical. I would argue against that by saying
that your experience gave you insight into how Company B operates. If Company B
is disrespectful to high-level job candidates and fails to show empathy and
personal interaction for something as simple as communicating that they didn’t
get the position, what makes you think that the treatment that you would get as
a customer would be any better? When you are exposed to the recruitment process
of an organization, you get a sneak peek into their culture. In a lot of ways,
Human Resources is one of the main gatekeepers and advocates of the company’s
culture. So, if your experience with HR during an advanced stage of recruitment
for a high-level position is cold and impersonal, it wouldn’t be a stretch to
say that approach probably permeates a lot of the culture of the company. Thus,
this is where HR unwittingly becomes part of the marketing process. That
negative impression that you leave with a candidate may be what prevents your
company from making a sale. In some cases, depending on the organizations involved,
that sale could be substantial. What HR did during that interaction completely
overrode anything that the Sales and Marketing departments did to get the sale.
Going Beyond Recruitment
Now, in this blog post, I kind of picked on HR and how many
HR departments are handling their recruitment processes (this is not completely
anecdotal as I have experienced it myself in past job searches), however, we
all need to realize that no matter our role, we are ambassadors of our
organizations and not just our current organization. Many of us remember names.
If we had a bad interaction with someone, we tend to remember that. That memory
tends to stay with us regardless of which organization that person is currently
with. Our interactions with each other matter and can build or destroy
credibility. I know that these days, it is common for many to have a short-term
outlook on things. Many people aren’t planning on being tied to any one
organization for the long-term and don’t think that the impressions that they
make during their tenure with their current organizations can have long-term
impacts on them. What this short-term thinking totally misses is that most of
us have long-term memories and those memories tend to follow specific people as
well as organizations. So, the impression or impact you make today can have
long-term ramifications. Always be aware of the impressions and perceptions
that you leave. When you interact with others, you are a brand ambassador for
not only your current organization, but any organization that you work for in
the future.
Conclusion
HR has a lot more brand and marketing influence than I think
many HR professionals realize. How often does HR’s impact on the organization’s
brand perception enter the thoughts of CHROs and recruiters? I would love to
hear feedback from HR professionals on this and not just the negative. If you
are doing something really forward thinking and progressive to represent your
organization as an HR professional, I would love to have you share that here.
Additionally, we need to realize that all of us, in our
interactions with others, can impact the brand perception of our organizations –
past, present, and future!
No comments:
Post a Comment